U.S. Answering Red Cross Appeal on Tsunami Disaster, Powell
Says
Four countries received immediate financial aid from
U.S. embassies
27 December 2004
The U.S. government is working out details of a plan to provide
$4 million in humanitarian assistance for victims of the devastating
December 26 Indian Ocean earthquake that sent tsunamis crashing
into coastal areas from Indonesia to Somalia, according to Secretary
of State Colin Powell.
In a December 27 press briefing, Powell said the offer of assistance
comes in response to an urgent appeal from the International Committee
of the Red Cross.
U.S. embassies have already provided a total of $400,000 in immediate
assistance for victims of the disaster in Sri Lanka, the Maldives,
India and Indonesia.
Ed Fox, assistant administrator of the U.S. Agency for International
Development (USAID) joined Powell at the briefing. He said USAID
has dispatched a 21-member disaster assistance response team (DART)
to the region to assess needs and help with the distribution of
relief supplies.
"The first important thing will be to help in the removal
of debris and disaster and to help the people, not only those
tragically killed, but the million or more who are also going
to be displaced and will need shelter and food and clothing,"
Fox said.
Fox added that he anticipated an additional $10 million in assistance,
in the form of cash or commodities, would soon be added to the
U.S. contribution, bringing the total initial response to around
$15 million.
Powell said he had been in contact with foreign ministers in
Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, India and Malaysia to reinforce
U.S. offers of assistance. He said the U.S. Pacific Command has
dispatched patrol aircraft to the region and the Pacific Fleet
is also considering ways to help relief efforts.
"[T]hey're sending some reconnaissance aircraft, and our
sea-based forces are moving into the area to see what can be done,"
he said. "First thing you have to do is make an assessment
of what can be done usefully, and then bring the assets you have
to bear."
Secretary Powell also responded to questions on the election
in Ukraine, the planned election in Iraq, and relations between
China and Taiwan.
Following is the State Department transcript of the briefing:
(begin transcript)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Office of the Spokesman
December 27, 2004
ON-THE-RECORD BRIEFING
Secretary of State Colin L. Powell and Assistant Administrator
for United States Agency for International Development Ed Fox
December 27, 2004
Washington, D.C.
(12:30 p.m. EST)
SECRETARY POWELL: Well, good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.
I wanted to give you an update on the situation in South Asia
as a result of the tsunami and the loss of life that was so tragic.
I have just been on the phone a few moments ago with President
Bush, where he has been following this situation very closely
from Crawford, and as he indicated in the statement that the White
House issued yesterday and he has also now written letters to
the heads of state of the countries affected, he wants to extend
his deepest condolences to the families of those who were lost.
This is, indeed, an international tragedy and we're going to do
everything we can to assist the nations that have been affected
in dealing with this tragedy.
While the loss of any single life is precious, I would also like
to take this opportunity to extend particular condolences for
the tragic death of Khun Bhumi Jensen, who is the son of Princess
Ubolratana and grandson of His Majesty King Bhumipol of Thailand.
We extend condolences to the royal family.
The United States has been following this situation from the
very beginning. Our embassies are working in the affected areas
to assist contacting families and others, U.S. citizens who are
unaccounted for. At the moment, we know of eight Americans who
have died and there are several hundred who are not accounted
for yet. It just means we haven't been able to reach out and get
contact with them. It does not imply that they are necessarily
injured or in any way a casualty.
For family members seeking information about one of their loved
ones, they can contact the hotline number that we have, 1-888-407-4747.
You can also go to the State Department website to get information
about each of the countries involved, and that's state.gov.
Our ambassadors in Sri Lanka, the Maldives, India and Indonesia
have provided a total of $400,000 in immediate assistance and
we are in discussions with the International Committee of the
Red Cross about providing $4 million in the course of the day
of the $6.6 million appeal that they have made. We are also examining
what other assets might be needed and we'll do everything we can
to help.
The United States Pacific Command is also involved in this, of
course. They have dispatched some P3 patrol aircraft to the region
and the Pacific fleet is examining what else they might be able
to do to help in this situation. I have also talked in the course
of the last 18 hours to my counterparts in Sri Lanka, Indonesia,
Thailand, India and Malaysia, to reinforce our offers of assistance.
USAID and other elements of the United States Government have
been deeply involved. What I'd like to do now, to give you more
details with respect to the support we are providing, is to introduce
Mr. Ed Fox, who is the Assistant Administrator of the U.S. Agency
for International Development. He'll give you some details and
then I will return to the podium for questions and one or two
other issues.
Ed.
MR. FOX: As soon as this tragic incident happened, USAID moved,
at the Secretary and the Administrator's direction, to set up
and dispatch a Disaster Assistance Response Team, which are our
specialists throughout the world. We drew two from the region
and we're sending an additional 19, for a total of 21 members,
at the moment, which will be in the area to help with sanitation,
health and other kinds of relief supplies.
We also draw upon our prepositioned supplies in the region, both
from the Philippines and in Dubai, where we have shelter and food.
We have water cans, bladders, and things of that nature. The first
important thing will be to help in the removal of debris and disaster
and to help the people, not only those tragically killed, but
the million or more who are also going to be displaced and will
need shelter and food and clothing.
As the Secretary had said, not only have we responded, both in
terms of the short run, with $400,000 to the various embassies
and also a large commitment to the International Red Cross and
Red Crescent, but it's anticipated that we'll add another -- at
least immediately -- another probably $10 million, for a total
of about $15 million, in our initial response to this tragedy.
SECRETARY POWELL: Thank you very much, Ed.
Before taking questions, I just might take note of the Ukrainian
election. This is an historic moment for democracy in Ukraine.
While the results of Sunday's election are not yet official, it
appears that the Ukrainian people finally had an opportunity to
choose freely their next president. As the OSCE observers mission
indicated in its statement, while some shortcomings remain, the
overall vote brought Ukraine substantially closer to meeting international
democratic standards: campaign conditions were more equal; observers
received fewer reports of pressure on voters; the election administration
was more transparent and the media more balanced than in previous
rounds. The Ukrainian people can truly be proud of this achievement.
Throughout the Ukrainian presidential campaign, the United States
has supported a democratic process, not a particular candidate.
We congratulate Ukrainians for the courage they displayed in standing
up for their democratic rights. We call on Ukrainians now to set
their divisions behind them and to refrain from violence, separatism
or provocations. We have said that we are prepared to work closely
with the winner of Sunday's election as long as the election was
won in a free and fair contest. We are prepared to move forward
on many issues of importance to Ukraine.
With that, let me invite Ed back up and take whatever questions
you might have on this or other issues.
Yes.
QUESTION: Ukraine, please?
SECRETARY POWELL: Well, let's go to Ukraine first.
QUESTION: Let's try Ukraine. Need it be an open sore, so far
as U.S.-Russian relations are concerned? You accused them of meddling.
And by the way, I know at least one think tank who says the U.S.'s
hands aren't all that clean; they didn't just train judges, you
had money going through the National Endowment and, second, going
to Yushchenko, that the U.S. was engaged, too.
But anyhow, what's the future? Is this a blot on U.S.-Russian
relations?
SECRETARY POWELL: No, I don't think so. And in fact, statements
coming out of Moscow today suggest that they will accept the results
of the election as well.
We have used for years organizations such as the National Endowment
for Democracy to assist civic society in learning how to participate
in open, free elections, and that is what we have done in this
instance as well. And all we wanted to see was a full, free, fair
election, and that appears now to be what happened yesterday.
And we will wait for the official results, which should be out
later this week, and I don't expect this to be a blot on U.S.-Russian
relations. We'll move forward.
Ukrainians chose for themselves. They did not choose for the
East or for the West. They have to live with both the East and
the West. And let's all join together now and see what we can
do to help Ukraine.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, an Iraq question. You spoke of free,
fair elections in Ukraine. The Iraqi Islamic Party has now announced
that it will also boycott the vote. How concerned are you about
the fact that Sunnis may not be terribly well represented, and
what, if anything, is the Administration doing with the Iraqis
to ensure that there will be Sunni representation in the next
government?
SECRETARY POWELL: Well, as you know, the President of the Iraqi
Interim Government and the Prime Minister have made it clear that
we're going to go forward with these elections on the 30th of
January and it's important that all segments of Iraqi society
across the political spectrum participate. I'm aware of the statement
that you just made with respect to this one party, although it's
not an official statement that they might not participate. We'll
have to wait and see whether that turns out to be the case or
not.
But we are encouraging all Sunnis and all Sunni leaders to join
in this effort to say no to terrorism, no to murder, and yes to
democracy. We are also talking to all of our friends in the region,
the neighboring countries that have influence and contacts with
the Sunni community, to get them to encourage Sunni leaders to
turn out the vote.
This is, I think, an essential aspect of the Iraqi Interim Government
and the coalition government -- coalition's process of moving
forward, to have this election on the 30th of January, with maximum
participation. Obviously, security is an issue and that's what
our commanders and the Iraqi Government is working on now, to
improve security conditions so that people will feel safe in coming
out.
It's interesting that even with difficult security conditions,
people are working to put in place polling stations, to put in
place the infrastructure needed to have an election, even within
the Sunni areas.
Yes.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, there were published reports in the
past few days that in meeting with the President and Tony Blair,
you suggested that there be more troops, more boots on the ground
in Iraq. One, is that true? And, two, what sort of reaction did
you get from both men?
SECRETARY POWELL: It was a pretty straightforward conversation.
I normally don't speak of these kinds of conversations that took
place in the Oval Office, but I will in this instance. And we
were talking about the situation on the ground. And I said that
there was a need for more troops on the ground and the solution
to that problem was the buildup of Iraqi forces, which is what
we are doing, which is what General Petraeus is all about, what
a lot of money is going into.
And so President Bush noted it, as did Prime Minister Blair,
and it wasn't a shocking statement or anything that they were
surprised about because that is our strategy, and I was just reinforcing
the need for us to build up Iraqi forces as rapidly as possible
because they are the ones who ultimately will have to dominate
the ground, take control of the terrain.
QUESTION: Can I do a follow-up? Apparently, according General
Petraeus and others, that's not going as well as one would hope,
or at least as well as the U.S. had hoped. Do you think that the
Iraqi forces will, by the end of next year, be able to maintain
security of their country, as General Casey said?
SECRETARY POWELL: It is a difficult task to create military forces
and police forces. It takes time. It takes effort. It takes equipment.
General Petraeus has got a plan that we're all supporting, and
I cannot tell you right now what it's going to look like at the
end of 2005. But more and more units are coming inline. Battalions
are being trained. Police are coming through the police training
system, both in neighboring countries as well as the facilities
within Iraq. But we're facing a difficult insurgency and nobody's
trying to sell that short. But ultimately, it's going to be Iraqi
security forces that are going to be responsible for the security
of Iraq.
Let's -- yeah.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary
SECRETARY POWELL: Yeah.
QUESTION: Can I get some clarification, perhaps, from Mr. Fox
on the additional funding that you would expect? You said there
will probably be $10 million more. Is that money that would then
be given to individual governments and not additional money to
the Red Cross in its appeal?
And could you also spell your name on camera? There are a lot
of people watching live, and I just want to make sure they can
[inaudible] appropriately.
Thank you. (Laughter.) Oh, no, no, I didn't do that on purpose,
Mr. Secretary.
SECRETARY POWELL: Yeah, right. (Laughter.) Spell your name, Ed.
QUESTION: No, I'm sorry. Is it --?
MR. FOX: E-d.
(Laughter.)
QUESTION: Is it just F-o-x? (Laughter.) I did not do that --
(laughter) -- oh, I'm so embarrassed. I didn't --
MR. FOX: Umm, my name is Fox.
QUESTION: I'm so sorry.
(Laughter.)
MR. FOX: Like the animal.
To your question about money, at this point, we don't know exactly
how much of that will be in terms of cash to be disbursed or whether
it will be commodities, but we anticipate that our initial reaction
to this is going to be in the neighborhood of $15 million. That
may increase. It may change. But we haven't divided it up until
our DART teams are all on the ground, in place. That's their purpose
is to make assessments as to where this money will need and to
what purpose. Sometimes it's moving commodities. Other times it's
contributions, as it is to the Red Cross and Red Crescent.
QUESTION: So the 4 million will go to the Red Cross, as you envision
it --
MR. FOX: Yes, that's part of the --
QUESTION: And the rest of it will go through USAID to where --
to their recommendation --
MR. FOX: At the moment, that's our anticipation, yes.
QUESTION: Okay, thank you.
SECRETARY POWELL: We also have to see this not just as a one-time
thing. Some 20-plus thousand lives have been lost in a few moments,
but the lingering effects will be there for years. The damage
that was caused, the rebuilding of schools and other facilities,
will take time. So you need a quick infusion to stabilize the
situation, take care of those who have been injured, get immediate
relief supplies in, and then you begin planning for the longer
haul.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary --
SECRETARY POWELL: A follow-up?
QUESTION: Just to follow you up, yes. I mean, I'm not putting
it as, you know, [inaudible] of clearing up possibly inaccurate
published reports. One deals with the advice, the Blair and Bush
meeting. The published report was you spoke of increasing American
troops --
SECRETARY POWELL: I did not.
QUESTION: The account I was given -- you were talking about Iraqi
troops, and that's correct, isn't it?
SECRETARY POWELL: I told you what I said.
QUESTION: Yes, sir.
SECRETARY POWELL: I don't -- I can't account for the rest of
the article.
QUESTION: Okay.
SECRETARY POWELL: But to refresh my memory, I went back and looked
specifically at the memorandum of conversation, and the point
I was making is that the solution to the problem of needing more
troops is not going to be solved by more coalition troops as much
as it's going to be solved by more Iraqi troops, and the article
made some connection to announcements that were made later. Well,
you'll have to ask the author of the article.
QUESTION: No, we got that account. And the other thing, there's
another published report about telling the Sunnis that they can
have a disproportionate share of the seats in the assembly.
SECRETARY POWELL: I would be delighted --
QUESTION: That also sounds a little bit whacky.
SECRETARY POWELL: Well, I don't write them. I just --
QUESTION: No, I know. But we've got to check them when they're
--
SECRETARY POWELL: Well, I will answer it. The Transitional Administrative
Law provides for 275 seats in the Transitional National Assembly.
There is no provision in the Transitional Administrative Law for
those seats to be selected in any other manner than by the election.
That's it.
With respect to the idea that you could then add more seats through
some process and go up to a higher number of seats, that is also
not provided for in the Transitional Administrative Law. The United
States Government has not been participating in any discussion
with Iraqi leaders as to how you might change the Transitional
Administrative Law to affect an increase in the size of the national
assembly. And even if somebody would wish to do that, you can't
do it until there is a national assembly to deal with this.
Now, when the national assembly is selected as a result of the
election on the 30th of January, they will create a transitional
administration. That transitional administration and its composition,
the leadership and the ministers that will be in that transitional
government, that is something to be decided by the Iraqi government
at that time.
QUESTION: One on Ukraine. Back to Ukraine. As you look to support
the new government and its ambitions for greater integration with
European and the U.S. institutions, what specifically can you
do to help them, and is there anything concrete that you're looking
for the government to do?
SECRETARY POWELL: We have, of course, relations with Ukraine
and we have regular contact with them. We don't believe that it
is in anyone's interest to suggest that Ukraine belongs either
to the East or the West. It belongs to the world. Ukrainians own
Ukraine. And what we're going to do is work with the Ukrainians
to help them achieve their dreams and aspirations, help them improve
their economy, and to help them improve their relations with us
and with the rest of the world.
And so we will wait until the election results have been certified
and there is a new government, and then we will engage with the
new government as to how best they think we can assist them in
their efforts to move forward with respect to economic development,
civil society, military-to-military relations. And I'm quite confident
that the new Ukrainian Government will be seeking the same kind
of dialogue with the Russian Federation, with the European Union
and all of the other countries in the region that it wishes to
have good relations with.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary.
SECRETARY POWELL: Yes.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, going back to Asia [inaudible] disaster.
Many countries are already commending the United States, especially
you, for acting fast, or help is on the way. My question, Mr.
Secretary, that as far as your estimate, that how many countries,
or if any countries officially have requested the United States
for help?
And also, it's been now four years that you have been dealing
with these Asian countries, and especially with India. Where do
you put, as we enter the new year - 2005 -- India and U.S. relations,
sir?
SECRETARY POWELL: On the, I think, one -- we have one official
request, Ed, that you may be aware of. I think Sri Lanka but I'm
--
MR. FOX: Sri Lanka.
SECRETARY POWELL: Sri Lanka has made an official formal request
for a particular kind of assistance. And all of the other countries,
when I spoke to their foreign ministers, I said, please let us
know what you need through our embassy. And so all of that is
working and being coordinated by our OFDA and AID officials.
As we enter 2005, I think U.S.-Indian relations are on a very
strong foundation. We have worked hard at it over the last four
years. We have a new strategic plan that we're working with the
Indian Government on. We've also maintained good relations with
all of our other friends in the region, all of the nations, for
example, who have been affected by this terrible tragedy, and
also by the relations we have been able to create with Pakistan.
And what we have tried to show to South Asia is that the United
States can deal with each country in a separate strong bilateral
relationship and through that technique also assist them to solve
regional problems. And I'm sure that will be continued into the
next administration as well.
QUESTION: If I could follow up, Mr. Secretary.
SECRETARY POWELL: Yes, please, please. Yeah.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, following up on your earlier response
about Iraq, do you think the Sunnis ought to be assured of a certain
number of senior government folks in the next government, regardless
of Sunni participation in the election?
SECRETARY POWELL: I think that for the government to be representative
and for the government to be effective, the Transitional National
Assembly would certainly have to take into account the ethnic
mix of the country and find a way to make sure that all segments
of the country believe that they are playing a proper role in
the government.
That's the way in which the Iraqi Interim Government was formed
and the current ministries operate, and it would seem to me to
be sensible for the transitional government to do the same thing.
But this is a matter for the Transitional National Assembly and
the transitional government to work out. The United States will
certainly assist them and help them and consult with them, but
this is a matter for them to make judgments on and make decisions
on, not for the United States.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, back on the Iraq elections there. Given
the possibility of boycotts, given the possibility of intimidation
and violence, is the United States making any contingency plans
for the possibility that these elections will not, for whatever
reason, turn out to be credible in the eyes of the international
community?
SECRETARY POWELL: We are working to have successful elections
on the 30th of January. We are working with the Iraqi Interim
Government, and the leadership of that government is committed
to these elections. Obviously, security is a concern and we're
doing everything we can to ensure, with the Iraqi Interim Government,
conditions of security that will permit all of the population
to vote.
There are different suggestions out as to what would happen if
only a certain number of Sunnis were to participate or there were
a particular part of the country that wasn't able to participate,
and I can't deal with these hypotheticals. Right now, we're moving
steadily forward to have election by all provinces, and anyone
who wants to go to a polling station on the 30th of January, to
do so.
Yes, sir.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, other sections, especially in Africa,
are worsened. And this morning, Tony Blair announced that he will
be hopefully sending 3,000 troops into Darfur, that region, because
the AU is slow to move. Also, it's no secret, but the Russians
and Chinese have been funneling in small weapons into that section.
And what can you do to pressure both of those governments --
SECRETARY POWELL: I'm not aware of the report about the UK, so
I can't comment on that. I spoke to Secretary Straw earlier today.
He did not mention that. And I don't have anything to say about
the second point you mentioned because I don't have that information.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, on the tsunami, what advice do you have
for Americans who want to donate and provide help and some sort
of assistance to the people, to the victims? Also, do you see
a significant role for the U.S military, especially in terms of
search and recovery efforts?
SECRETARY POWELL: The United States Pacific Command is looking
at this very question now, the second question that you raised.
And as I mentioned, they're sending some reconnaissance aircraft
and our sea-based forces are moving into the area to see what
can be done. The first thing you have to do is make an assessment
of what can be done usefully, and then bring the assets that you
have to bear.
With respect to the first question, I think there -- I don't
know if you have it with you, Ed, the particular place you can
make donations. We'll get it to you. Adam will look it up. It's
already on some of the television stations. They're showing UN
addresses and places where you can make donations, and we'll get
that to you.
Yes, ma'am.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, you talk about the initial infusion
of assistance in that region. Have you heard, or is there any
consideration for help for U.S. economic interests in the region?
Have you heard of any disaster plans in that regard?
SECRETARY POWELL: In terms of our business presence out there
or factories, no, I haven't received any information on that yet.
We've really been focusing on the humanitarian aspects of this.
And I'm sure that kind of issue will come up, as we get further
into this crisis. I don't think you have any on it.
MR. FOX: Saving lives.
SECRETARY POWELL: Yeah. Yes, ma'am.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, one question on China. The new Chinese
defense white paper just released also emphasized the possibility
of a [inaudible] in cross-strait. Combined with the anti-secession
law they were promoting now, would you agree there is a negative
train has been triggered, instead of a peaceful dialogue that
you have been promoting in the past few months in cross-strait
relations?
Thank you.
SECRETARY POWELL: We are still committed to our "One China"
policy, of course, that rests on the three communiqués
and our obligations under the Taiwan Relations Act, and we have
always encouraged both parties to find ways to reach out to one
another. I'm aware that there is modernization taking place in
the Chinese armed forces and we are monitoring that closely and
we're in conversations with our Chinese colleagues about it.
And so I don't see reason for immediate concern at the moment.
I think everybody realizes that this is not the time to escalate
tension in the straits and we hope that that will continue to
be the case, that tension --
QUESTION: Can I follow up?
SECRETARY POWELL: No, I really have to move on --
QUESTION: Do you know anything about a new bin Laden tape [inaudible]?
SECRETARY POWELL: No, I don't know anything about a new bin Laden.
Thank you.
QUESTION: Thank you, Mr. Secretary. Happy New Year.
SECRETARY POWELL: Happy New Year, everybody.
(end transcript)