|
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC TRADE POLICY
REVIEW
United States Opening Statement
Ambassador Linnet F. Deily
October 7, 2002
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The United States welcomes the delegation
from Santo Domingo here for the Dominican Republic's WTO Trade Policy
Review. We also warmly welcome the Dominican Republic's new ambassador
to the WTO, the Honorable Rubin Nunez. We look forward to working
with you towards meeting the January 2005 deadline for completing
the WTO negotiations.
We appreciate the work of the WTO Secretariat in producing its
report on the D.R.'s trade policy regime, the discussant for his
insightful and provocative comments, and we welcome the report prepared
by the Government of the Dominican Republic. We have prepared some
questions based on these reports, and we look forward to receiving
the D.R.'s answers and learning more about its trade policies and
practices.
Our trade relationship takes place within the broader context
of excellent cooperation between our countries on a variety of matters
of mutual interest, including on-going security and counter-narcotics
efforts. We also commend the D.R. for its strong stance against
abusive and exploitative child labor through its close collaboration
with the ILO, and for its leadership in the fight against international
crime and terrorism.
Trade between the United States and the Dominican Republic is a
cornerstone of our bilateral relations and generates important benefits
for both countries. The D.R. is our largest trading partner in the
Caribbean Basin region with $8.6 billion in two-way goods trade
during 2001. The D.R. also continues to be the leading user of benefits
under our Caribbean Basin Initiative preferences program.
The questions we will submit under the D.R.'s trade policy review
focus principally on the following areas:
· the D.R.'s policies on foreign investment;
· foreign participation in the provision of mining and energy
services;
· the status of ratification of the D.R.'s 1997 financial
services commitments;
· operation of the D.R.'s free trade zones; and
· recent developments in the telecommunications sector.
We are impressed by the progress the DR has made in its economic
reforms since the 1996 TPR. The Dominican Republic has experienced
remarkable economic growth, increased investment, and the dynamism
characteristic of a maturing economy. We are also struck by the
significance of a growing and competitive services sector, which
has been leading job creation in the D.R.
The United States commends the D.R. on recent liberalization in
its services trade regime and encourages the D.R. to schedule commitments
that reflect these policy changes, in the interest of transparency.
We have concerns about the D.R.'s IPR regime, especially the patent
law and IPR enforcement. We would also like to register our concern
about the WTO-consistency of the D.R.'s excise tax on spirits and
would appreciate an update on plans to revise the tax structure.
In addition, we have a number of concerns related to Free Trade
Zones. Though they are central to the DR's trade strategy, some
aspects of their operation are not yet WTO consistent, and we will
be interested to discuss this in further detail. We are also concerned
that the economic reforms the DR has undertaken in the past several
years, have not adequately addressed the sectoral divergences between
FTZs and the domestic economy that were noted in the 1996 TPR. Some
of our concerns also pertain to labor rights in the FTZs.
Our questions and comments are offered in a constructive spirit.
We thank the delegation from the Dominican Republic in advance for
its willingness to consider these points and welcome the opportunity
to engage with the D.R. and other delegations in a discussion of
the D.R.'s current trade policy regime. Thank you.
|