| |
|
WTO TRADE POLICY REVIEW OF BANGLADESH We welcome Secretary Rahman and his delegation to Geneva for this second trade policy review of Bangladesh We look forward to discussing the progress that Bangladesh has made in liberalizing its trade and investment regime and discussing the specific questions which we have tabled. We appreciate the thorough report prepared by the Secretariat and the remarks by the discussant. Bangladesh is an active and important participant in the WTO. We have a long history of working together on matters of mutual concern. Most recently in preparation for the Seattle Ministerial, we developed a proposal to revitalize the Integrated Framework of technical assistance for the benefit of the least developed countries. We appreciate Bangladesh=s continued leadership and creativity in this area. The U.S. GSP program and generous quota arrangements have played an important role in the impressive growth of Bangladesh=s exports. The United States is Bangladesh=s largest overseas market, accounting for 40 percent of its exports, worth $1.9 billion in 1999. We are also the largest consumer of apparel products from Bangladesh, which comprised approximately 85 percent of our imports from Bangladesh. We encourage Bangladesh to reconsider its import bans
on a number of textile and apparel items. Import bans undermine the
international competitiveness of producers, induce smuggling and can
limit new business opportunities. As the Secretariat=s report notes, Bangladesh maintains a high level of state run enterprises and has not made use of the GATS framework. We strongly encourage Bangladesh to make broader commitments in the services area. Liberalization of infrastructure and financial services would, in particular, complement Bangladesh=s investment objectives. We applaud Bangladesh=s efforts to attract business through its liberal investment regime, and we are encouraged by the efforts Bangladesh has made to simplify its tariff structure and reduce applied rates. However, Bangladesh remains heavily dependent on border tax revenue and the complexity of the tariff system continues to create economic inefficiencies at the expense of development. Accordingly, we encourage Bangladesh to consider additional tariff reform measures, such as eliminating combined tariffs, expanding bindings on industrial tariffs, and reducing the confusing array of tariff and tax concessions. The Report indicates that Bangladesh has not provided
notifications or has yet to implement its WTO obligations in several
areas, including import licensing, customs valuation, TBT, and several
subsidy-related programs. However, it is clear from the Report=s annex
on technical assistance that both the Secretariat and Bangladesh have
made an effort to identify areas where technical assistance is needed. We hope today to get a better understanding of where
Bangladesh stands on implementation and to identify more fully additional
technical assistance needs. We are committed to working with WTO Members
to address implementation issues in a practical manner, that both
recognizes resource constraints of certain members and endeavors to
honor the obligations made during the Uruguay Round We are pleased that the Government of Bangladesh is
working with the ILO to reduce child labor. Since 1995, some 9,000
former children garment workers have been provided with educational
opportunities. To encourage further progress in this area, President
Clinton announced an $8.6 million assistance package during his recent
visit to South Asia. We encourage Bangladesh to undertake similar
efforts to develop rights of association for workers in export processing
zones. At the same time, Bangladesh must also continue to look reform from within. We encourage Bangladesh to consider seriously the comments made by the Secretariat in its report and by Members during today=s meeting, with respect to further trade liberalization. Bangladesh has much to gain from expanded services commitments, follow-through on technical assistance activities, and its full participatation in WTO work. |